![]() ![]() Not content with making a fine job of introducing Carlson, he makes an excellent job of introducing himself and his topic. Here is a speech that I offer as a bonus and which moved Madam Deputy Speaker to declare it one of the best speeches she had ever heard in the House of Commons. Yes he really is a very good speaker, equipped with an outstanding memory, and amazingly adept at addressing matters that are miles outside his apparent expertise. His attitude throughout suggests he is open to debating all views, and the consequent conversation will be the richer for it. I would have challenged his repeatedly trotting out ‘legitimate state monopoly on the use of violence’ as a commonplace desirability, because defining ‘legitimate’ presents immediate knottiness, even if you are prepared to overlook the 2nd amendment in the US Bill Of Rights, and so on. Had I been in the audience I would have highlighted the way the developed world’s devotion to the preposterous climate change fallacy denies impoverished African countries access to cheap energy from coal. Though the absence of an audience mic prevents us from properly hearing the questions, the way he addresses them seems to acknowledge their value and his answers to these relatively random issues are as full of detailed data from memory as the main body of the speech. That quality enriches the questions he receives. Insecurity would not allow that admission. Stewart’s willingness in this speech to admit to questions to which he has no answers speaks eloquently for his inner confidence. Deep knowledge brings with it a heightened awareness of that which you don’t know. There is another less obvious quality to his knowledge of his subject. ![]() In 2002 he took leave from his job with the British foreign service to walk across Asia, entitling him thereafter to speak for those at the grass roots as one who had lived there. Consider the extraordinary lengths to which he goes in order to get right under the skin of the communities and cultures with which he deals. We see him showing total command of his subject, quoting from memory myriad facts, figures and a wide range of random data, and we are reminded that he makes his own luck. Stewart here is being rather better than “ok”. Well of course! In an ideal world no one would be asked to speak on something they didn’t really know (though there are tricks) but this isn’t an ideal world and adverse circumstances arise. We see him here displaying all the qualities of all the best speakers.ĭuring preliminary chats with my trainees, I regularly hear the protestation that they’re “ok” when lucky enough to be dealing with subject matter they know really well, but when ordered to deliver a presentation on something of which they have scant knowledge they are less good. Luckily, Yoodli provides a transcript and data driven analytics on each speaker’s delivery to help support your feedback.Ĭontact Michael Davis at Speaking CPR to see a demonstration of your presentation or examples from well known individuals like Steve Jobs, Oprah Winfrey, or Barack Obama.I did more than check details on that previous post, I re-read it and will take back not a word. Critique the content (the speaker’s message and supporting material), structure (how well one section flowed into another) and delivery (the filler words, congruity and authenticity of your body language, and pacing, volume and rate of speech). For example, instead of saying “pause for emphasis,” say “Consider pausing longer at this point.”ĥ) Content, structure, delivery: Consider separating your feedback into distinct sections. Instead of saying “you were unclear”, consider saying “this section seemed unclear”Ĥ) Use gentle recommendations: The goal is to help speakers’ get back up and also find their authentic voice. Make sure you’re critiquing the content and delivery as opposed to the person. ![]() The speaker no longer needs to scroll back and forth to find exactly what you were referring to.ģ) Critique the speech, not the speaker: Remember that speakers go out of their way to ask for your feedback. With time stamped feedback on Yoodli, you can leave comments as you watch specific parts of the speech. With Yoodli, our AI-driven story diagnosis tool - you can share a speech or story with one click of a button!Ģ) Use time stamped feedback: You want your feedback to be as specific as possible. Here’s what has helped my clients:ġ) Share speeches seamlessly: In the virtual world, it’s a pain to share videos - upload, download, watch it on one screen, take notes on another screen, follow up over email - too time consuming). You want to be honest with your feedback without crushing the other person’s confidence! It’s a delicate balance. One of the most common questions I hear is, “How do I critique a speech without sounding like a jerk?”
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |